Oh, and btw, if you ever come back, you'll know what you'll be asked for to get help. Patiently wait for the devs to figure out how to run Monterey, or go and use another hypervisor. We're all fellow Virtualbox users here, not devs, and askers of questions who won't cooperate with enough data, like a log, to help us help them, well, we're just not able to help! Since you will not help us help you by providing a log, even an obfuscated one (folks do that, you know, and it's OK if they do as long as they tell us what data types they changed), then this conversation is over. The same period of development time happened for Catalina and Big Sur. The devs will have Monterey going shortly. 'Tis a patently ridiculous idea that the devs would ignore a new version of a supported OS. You seem to be under the impression that the devs aren't working on Monterey as a VM. Todd Almighty wrote:you should immediately assign a dev to try out your product with a Monterey guest Besides, it's also a convenient way to distribute the installer, particularly when you wish to install macOS Monterey on multiple machines. I'm not sure what the point of that is, but it certainly doesn't seem to have any upside for the external dev community (whoever builds VB from source). It can be used to install macOS Monterey on a virtual machine (e.g., VirtualBox or VMware) running on a Windows computer or create a bootable USB for upgrading or clean installing macOS Monterey on a Mac. Also select the VirtualBox Extension pack OracleVMVirtualBo圎xtensionPack-6.1.26-145957. Instead we have the main development branch apparently secret, with only one-time snapshots published of release branches (or tagged points of main), and then a separate subbranch, 6.1.97, shown to the public (with unknown relation to "main" or other releases). Go to the VirtualBox 6.1.26 download site and select VirtualBox-6.1.26-145957-Win.exe. Well's it's a confusing situation, because what normally would happen in an open source project is that the entire source code tree would be available, with the "main" branch representing the most recent changes, and various release branches getting cut off the main branch (or, if there are no separate branches, at least the main would be tagged at timepoints indicating the release versions). And for each minor release of VirtualBox (6.1.0 up to 6.1.28) the sources have been published. Here is what I added to Configuration.Fth0 wrote:AFAIK, there hasn't been any minor release of VirtualBox 6.1.97 in the previous 21 months, so everything is fine with the SVN trunk. Start a VM installed from scratch with Monterey OR 2. This is my setup specs just in case it’s needed… macOS Monterey Version 12.2.1īluetooth Adapter: TP-Link USB UB400 4.0 Bluetooth Dongle Receiver 11:48:35 ERROR (SyncWorker_4) Couldn't discover bluetooth devices: No such device 11:48:23 ERROR (SyncWorker_2) Couldn't discover bluetooth devices: No such device 11:48:11 ERROR (SyncWorker_6) Couldn't discover bluetooth devices: No such device 11:47:59 ERROR (SyncWorker_3) Couldn't discover bluetooth devices: No such device 11:47:47 ERROR (SyncWorker_0) Couldn't discover bluetooth devices: No such device 11:47:35 ERROR (SyncWorker_4) Couldn't discover bluetooth devices: No such device Install VirtualBox and the VirtualBox Extension Pack on your Windows 10/11 Computer 3. Contact the software manufacturer for assistance. Enable Virtualization on your Windows 10/11 PC 2. Create a new VZVirtualMachine from the VZVirtualMachineConfiguration. The installer encountered an error that caused the installation to fail. Install a macOS using a VZMacOSInstaller with a VM instance and an image on the local filesystem using the following steps: Create a VZVirtualMachineConfiguration with a VZMacPlatformConfiguration configured as described above. 11:47:23 ERROR (SyncWorker_2) Couldn't discover bluetooth devices: No such device An upgrade of VirtualBox to 6.1.28 fails on MacOS Monterey 12.0.1 with the message: The installation failed. 11:47:11 ERROR (SyncWorker_1) Couldn't discover bluetooth devices: No such device Integration: bluetooth_tracker (documentation, issues)įirst occurred: 11:34:35 AM (55 occurrences)Ĭouldn't discover bluetooth devices: No such deviceĪnd when Im looking at the full logs I see… 11:46:59 ERROR (SyncWorker_0) Couldn't discover bluetooth devices: No such device Source: components/bluetooth_tracker/device_tracker.py:73 According to VirtualBox it shows that the usb dongle has been “captured” (screenshot included below) and the error I see within HA is… Logger: _vice_tracker I’m trying to get bluetooth working on my HA setup which is running on VirtualBox on a macOS host machine but I can’t seem to get the integration to work with the dongle and have tried various troubleshooting steps before posting.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |